steakhal added a comment.
Vince, please update the summary - it looks really weird. Along with that the
content of it might not be much useful, as we have a test case to demonstrate
the crash; you can probably remove those dumps etc.
Otherwise LGTM.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/cast-value-state-dump.cpp:26
if (dyn_cast_or_null<Square>(S)) {
- // expected-note@-1 {{Assuming 'S' is not a 'Square'}}
+ // expected-note@-1 {{Assuming 'S' is not a 'const class clang::Square *'}}
// expected-note@-2 {{Taking false branch}}
----------------
martong wrote:
> steakhal wrote:
> > IDK, I see the motivation, but we don't need the full name of these in most
> > cases.
> > I find it more disturbing than helpful. I would instead stick to the
> > shorter form.
> I see your point, but I this way, the checker provides more precise type
> info, which is good in my opinion.
Okay. It's not that important. This is a domain-specific check only for llvm
codebases, so I'm not too picky about it.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D127105/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D127105
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
