xazax.hun accepted this revision. xazax.hun added a comment. This patch looks good to me. On the other hand, I was wondering whether functions like this would be handled:
pair<optional, optional> f(); array<optional, 4> g(); MyStructWithOptionals h(); And so on. In general, I wonder if it is a better approach to be able to plug the optional creation function into the general value creation function of the engine. So whenever the engine encounters an optional type, it could create the corresponding value. It could do it lazily or eagerly, however it choses. And the user would no longer need to match all the possible ways an optional type can be mentioned somewhere. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126972/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126972 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
