aaron.ballman added a comment. In D126796#3551280 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126796#3551280>, @MaskRay wrote:
> In D126796#3551261 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126796#3551261>, @cjdb wrote: > >> In D126796#3550848 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126796#3550848>, @MaskRay >> wrote: >> >>> FYI `diagtool tree` dumps the diagnostics. You can even provide -W options >>> and observe the differences. >> >> Is `diagtool tree` something that users widely know about? > > I think no. But any random new option to clang will have the same > discoverability problem. Yes, but I think there's a pretty wide discoverability gap between "documented command line option that shows up in Clang" and "random utility that doesn't have any obvious relationship to Clang specifically". Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126796/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126796 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
