sammccall added a comment. In D126397#3547438 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126397#3547438>, @sammccall wrote:
> In D126397#3547060 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126397#3547060>, @thakis wrote: > >> Should pseudo-gen honor LLVM_USE_HOST_TOOLS too? It looks like it's >> basically the same situation. > > Yes, I agree, it should. I'll send a patch. Committed in 9d991da60df492a191b34aa3e75484ddd27e8930 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG9d991da60df492a191b34aa3e75484ddd27e8930> >> Regarding building native tools while cross compiling - for other tools so >> far, we’ve also had the option to pass an option like >> -DLLVM_TABLEGEN=path/to/llvm-tblgen. If all the needed native tools are >> provided that way, the build doesn’t need to set up the nested native cmake >> build while cross compiling. Should we prove a way to do that for this build >> time generation tool too? > > Yeah, it seems reasonable to spend a little bit more cmake complexity for > this. > I hope it can be done in a few lines (digging into it) esp given how hard it > is to maintain non-bot-covered cmake configs. Sent D126717 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126717> (I verified this locally, but want to make sure I'm not misunderstanding what we want here). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126397/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126397 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
