carlo.bertolli added a comment. Hi
Yes, the purpose of these patches was to check correctness of code gen for the related clauses when targeting nvptx exclusively. Since I wrote these tests, the base support changed to generate same code on host and any device type, and it seemed to me that the need for a differentiated regression test was not there any more (happy to be told otherwise). Of course, there are things that we would like to do a bit different on nvptx, especially for firstprivate, but I have not yet had time to work on this and to reflect this into this regression test. If I do, I would like to update this patch, but it seemed too early to just abandon this. Thanks and please do let me know what is your viewpoint on this - Carlo Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D18286 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
