tra added a comment. > The one downside to this is that we are no longer stable under multiple > compilations of the same file.
This is a moderately serious issue. Some users care about the build reproducibility. Recompiling the same sources and getting different results will trigger all sorts of red flags that would need to be investigated in order to make sure the build is not broken. > However, this is a very niche use-case and is not supported by Nvidia's CUDA > compiler so it likely to be good enough. The fact that NVCC didn't always generate the same output **was** an issue when we were using it for CUDA compilation. In general, "not supported by NVCC" is not quite applicable here, IMO. The goal here is to make clang work correctly. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125904/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125904 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
