lenary added a comment. In D122747#3509495 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122747#3509495>, @lenary wrote:
> I want to keep the number of llvm functions the same, as they cover a wide > variety of control flow at a wide variety of data widths which the pass > should cope with. > > One thing that I would like to cut down is the duplicated set of CHECK lines, > one with scheduling and one without, but I'm not sure how to do that (the set > with scheduling are there to test that `-mcpu=cortex-a55` enables the pass), > I'm not sure of a better way of doing the same. After a quick look, I can confirm that the ARM Backend seems to disregard `tune-cpu` metadata, the subtarget is initialized with TuneCPU equal to CPU, which makes this difficult. Still investigating whether `--enable-misched=false` will be enough. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122747/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122747 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
