ahatanak added a comment. Is it not possible to handle this similarly to `volatile unsigned`? If I replace `_Atomic unsigned` with `volatile unsigned`, I see `LookupOverloadedBinOp` succeed without having to strip volatile because `addAssignmentArithmeticOverloads` adds candidates with volatile types.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125349/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125349 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
