aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Preprocessor/pragma_microsoft.c:210
+#pragma function(main) // expected-warning {{'main' is not a
recognized builtin; consider including <intrin.h>}}
+#pragma function( // expected-warning {{missing ')'
after}}
+#pragma function(int) // expected-warning {{missing ')'
after}}
----------------
steplong wrote:
> Hmm does it make sense for this to be a warning and not an error?
I'm glad I'm not the only one who questioned this. :-D I tend to be of the
opinion that syntax errors should be errors rather than warnings. However, this
is using an existing warning that's used by a bunch of other pragmas so I think
it's defensible to use it here, especially given that this pragma form is
commonly used for compiler extensions (so who knows, the syntax could be valid
for another compiler, I guess).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124702/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124702
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
