serge-sans-paille added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp:1609
struct X { int a[2]; };
constexpr int *n = (X){1, 2}.a; // expected-warning {{C99}} expected-warning
{{temporary}}
// expected-error@-1 {{constant expression}}
----------------
@efriedma this is the test you asked for. it's already implemented, and my
patch doesn't change its behavior, which matches the GCC behavior.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124038/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124038
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
