kuganv added a comment. @sammccall, What are the first steps that is needed for supporting modules with clangd. From what I see, options related to handling comments that are specifically added to the compile options by clangd needs handling. This RFC diff is on that note.
AFIK, since, clangd relies on clang proper for compilation action, I thought the module semantics would work as in normal clang compilation. I could be completely wrong here and missing some details. I am happy to look into any other requirements and iterate the diff to get it to where we want it to be acceptable by the community. Any feedback welcome. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124909/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124909 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
