sammccall added a subscriber: ldionne.
sammccall added a comment.

In D121838#3470478 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D121838#3470478>, @ldionne wrote:

> I think @phosek is the right person to look at this. I looked at it and it 
> seems fine, but I don't know how the runtimes tests are setup well enough to 
> spot an issue if there were one.
>
> Nit: I'd suggest rebasing and re-uploading the patch so that the runtimes CI 
> can run again (and hopefully pass -- there was a flake last time).

OK. I was requesting extra reviews because of the libc++ herald policy.
But since the changes are mechanical/cross-cutting, phosek isn't a libc++ 
approver, and there hasn't been more activity here I'm going to try to get this 
landed.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D121838/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D121838

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D121838: Generalize &qu... Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to