dblaikie added a comment. Would an explicit naming be more suitable than a region start/end? (I'd have considered this feedback for D116503 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116503> too, but didn't catch that one in review) The region based thing makes non-positional arguments weirdly positional (not that these are the first instances of that in compiler/linker tools, I don't think) - and I guess the override behavior is already positional to some degree.
But something like -Wno-unused-command-line-argument=-Wfoobarbaz -Wfoobarbaz - sort of like password entry, type it twice so you've got less chance of mistakes? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121175/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D121175 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
