aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:1356
+
+ PP.Diag(FlagTok, diag::ext_pp_gnu_line_directive);
} else if (FlagVal == 2) {
----------------
ken-matsui wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > I speculate that this change is wrong.
> >
> > The goal here is to diagnose any time there's a GNU line marker and now
> > we're only trigging the diagnostic when the line marker's value is 1; that
> > misses diagnostics when the marker value is something else.
> >
> > That's why I suggested warning each place we return `false` from this
> > function -- those are the situations when the line marker is syntactically
> > correct and we're going to make use of it in the caller. (We don't want to
> > warn about use of a line marker when we're going to generate an error
> > anyway.)
> @aaron.ballman
>
> Thank you!
>
> Just to confirm, do I need to remove the call of `Diag` after `GetLineValue`
> and put `Diag`s into all branches of returning `false` in this function?
> If so, I think putting `Diag` after the call of this function would be better.
> If so, I think putting Diag after the call of this function would be better.
You are correct and I agree, good suggestion!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124534/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124534
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
