shafik added a comment.
In D123319#3473283 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123319#3473283>, @dblaikie wrote:
> ('scuse the delay)
>
> Baseline: I'm still not really sure this is the right direction. Is there a
> sound argument for why this change is suitable for lambdas, but not for other
> types? I believe all the situations that can happen with other types can
> happen with lambdas (& the other way around) with sufficiently interestingly
> crafted inputs.
I had a couple of approaches but once I saw how gcc was handling it, I just
went with consistency with gcc. I might have been missing some cases but I did
not have other test case that I ran into issues with.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123319/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123319
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
