MaskRay added a comment.

In D119136#3462579 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136#3462579>, @aaron.ballman 
wrote:

> In D119136#3462570 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136#3462570>, @MaskRay wrote:
>
>> Sorry but I've reverted this patch and all its fixups in 
>> c79e6007edef4b0044be93c4ffff64dc806ac687 
>> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc79e6007edef4b0044be93c4ffff64dc806ac687> and 
>> 0f5dbfd29ae0df215a01aff80d29255bb799fed0 
>> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG0f5dbfd29ae0df215a01aff80d29255bb799fed0> .
>> See https://reviews.llvm.org/D123909#3461716 for another case not considered.
>
> Please double check with the patch author and reviewers before unilaterally 
> reverting multiple commits with no notice and no failing build bots. I do not 
> see a valid justification for these reverts -- the concerns have been true 
> positives so far (or have generated core issues that WG21 is still 
> discussing), and @cor3ntin has been highly responsive with addressing the 
> fallout. This is a significant amount of churn that I don't think should have 
> happened.

Reply to both this message and https://reviews.llvm.org/D123909#3462560:

I am sorry but this thread has gained reports from multiple independent parties 
about breakage, and I just thought the followups did not fix all issues.
I confess I do not really understand the subtle areas in the language.
My decision to revert was mostly driven by fixups' descriptions like "but did 
not properly handled dependant context,"

- which made me believe there were indeed bugs in the implementation and new 
corner cases just emerged.

I'd agree that there is invalid code which is not correctly rejected, but the 
fixups mixed with bugfixes made the whole picture unclear.

I apology if I did make wrong reverts.
The reverts have been made.
I hope that starting from a clean state is not too bad. I am grateful to 
@cor3ntin who is highly responsive with addressing the fallout.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to