tstellar added a comment. In D123850#3453750 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123850#3453750>, @cor3ntin wrote:
> @tstellar I wasn't sure what the procedure was for backporting fixes, so I > made a PR. I think your suggestion of keeping the old signature works well. > This also modifies the serialized AST, is that an issue for backports? (If it > is, I'm not sure i see a way to move forward with this!) I don' t think we have a written policy about the serialized AST format like we do API/ABI. What are the use cases where maintaining the AST format is important? @rsmith Do you have any opinion about changing the serialized AST in a bugfix release? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D123850/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D123850 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
