ChuanqiXu accepted this revision. ChuanqiXu added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In D122119#3402168 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119#3402168>, @urnathan wrote: > In D122119#3401322 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119#3401322>, @ChuanqiXu > wrote: > >> > > > >> I think the example is invalid since it violates [[ >> http://eel.is/c++draft/module.interface#6 | [module.interface]p6 ]] >> explicitly. If this is intended behavior or by design, we should change the >> wording. > > That wording failed to be updated when the linkage-decl changes went in. > I'll add a note to DR 2541. Linkage specifications, module purview, and > module attachment OK, if the wording is not consistent with the design, I have no further objections. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
