beanz added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Frontend/InitPreprocessor.cpp:401-403 + uint32_t StageInteger = StageInteger = + (uint32_t)TI.getTriple().getEnvironment() - + (uint32_t)llvm::Triple::Pixel; ---------------- rnk wrote: > This here suggests that the order of the HLSL environments in the triple > really, really matter, since we expose them to users. That's really > surprising: it means small changes in LLVM affect this pre-processor macro in > surprising ways. I see the test for this, but what do you think about adding > a static_assert to Triple.cpp to move the check into LLVM? Something like: > static_assert(Triple::Compute - Triple::Pixel == 1, "incorrect HLSL env > order"); > static_assert(Triple::Amplification - Triple::Pixel == 2, "incorrect HLSL > env order"); > > Maybe this is addressed elsewhere, I haven't looked at all patches > holistically. This is more or less verified by the test case checking the preprocessor values, but static_asserts would provide a more clear error, so I'll add some. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122087/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122087 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits