aaron.ballman requested changes to this revision. aaron.ballman added inline comments. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticCommonKinds.td:127-129 +def warn_eval_method_setting_is_meaningless_in_value_unsafe_context : Warning< + "setting the eval method via '-ffp-eval-method' or '#pragma clang fp eval_method' " + "has not effect when numeric results of floating-point calculations aren't value-safe.">, InGroup<Pragmas>; ---------------- I think we should split the diagnostics into two -- one as a Sema diagnostic (as a warning for the pragma case, in the Pragmas diagnostic group) and one as a Frontend diagnostic (as an error, for the command line case). Basically, I think we should treat the command line options as being mutually exclusive and handle it the same as any other "these options cannot be used together" situation. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp:259-260 getLangOpts().getFPEvalMethod()); + if (getLangOpts().ApproxFunc || getLangOpts().AllowFPReassoc || + getLangOpts().AllowRecip) + // When these options are used, the compiler is allowed to make ---------------- I don't think this is the right place to diagnose this -- these are command line options that don't play well together, so they should be handled when processing command line options. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122155/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122155 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits