pcwang-thead added a comment.

In D70401#3395340 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70401#3395340>, @kito-cheng wrote:

> Last LLVM sync-up call @asb has raise the discussion about the ILP32E issue, 
> so here is note from my site:
>
> RISC-V psABI doc still say "we don't  guarantee the stability of `ILP32E`", 
> the reason is RV32E still not a ratified extension, but as psABI chair, what 
> I can say is we intend to do NOT change as possible.
>
> As I know rv32e*/ilp32e are already used by many vendors (include SiFive), so 
> I support ilp32e should be supported on LLVM upstream.

Thanks! I will spend some time to make this patch compatible with GCC 
implementation, please feel free to give some comments and suggestions!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70401/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70401

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to