ymandel added a comment. In D121797#3392444 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D121797#3392444>, @xbolva00 wrote:
> Why this should be maintained and developed by LLVM/Clang developers and not > by Chromium? That's a good question. I think the short answer, that skirts around the issue, is that this is targeted for use in an upcoming clang-tidy check, and we don't have any framework for clients developing their own pluggable models for individual checks. Chromium could find some way to patch their clang-tidy source, I suppose, but we'd rather not encourage that. This framework is new and under development and the benefit of accomodating Chromium (in this very small way) seems worth the feedback from them applying it to their codebase. That said, we are *also* in discussions with them to change their implement of CHECK, etc. so as to obviate the need for this model at all. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121797/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D121797 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
