void added a comment.

In D93182#2451509 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93182#2451509>, @lebedev.ri wrote:

> Out of curiocity, are all checkpatch diagnostics (and something else)?
> are planned to be ported into being clang-tidy checks?
> How many will checks will that be?
> I'll be slightly worried if `linuxkernel` module
> ends up having more checks than all other modules combined..

In my opinion, we shouldn't be concerned about the number of checks, especially 
with a code base as large and complex as Linux. Linux also has security issues 
that other pieces of software don't have, which need detailed checks.

If the number of checks is considered too much, what other options should we go 
with?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D93182/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D93182

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to