junaire added a comment. In D119609#3355368 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119609#3355368>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Does this break a case like this? https://godbolt.org/z/Tc9Ko7hWY No, after applying the patch, clang accepts the code just like gcc > it seems the problem is with the Expression statements, and I'm not sure why > we are doing "ActOnCapScopeReturnStmt" when we aren't really in a capture > scope anymore, right? I guess we properly diagnose the use of a capture in > this scope, but I don't think we should be here in the 1st place. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119609/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119609 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
