iains added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Modules/inconsist-export-template.cpp:19-23
+// FIXME: We should reject following specialization,
+// since it tries to export a name which is already introduced.
+export template <>
+void f1<int>() {
+
----------------
ChuanqiXu wrote:
> urnathan wrote:
> > I don't think we should be testing for ill-formed code here. We want to
> > verify that explicit instantiations, explicit specializations and implicit
> > instantiations all get the expected linkage -- both external linkage on
> > exported entities, module linkage on non-exported module-purview entities.
> I think it could add an `expected-error` once we complete the check in
> compiler so I added the FIXME here.
would it be possible to find a suitable place in the source for the FIXME?
I would be concerned that it could get forgotten in the test-case.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D120397/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D120397
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
