[PATCH] D120512: [clang-format] Fix requires related crash

[Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

HazardyKnusperkeks updated this revision to Diff 411658.
HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment.

Changed test.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D120512/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D120512

Files:
  clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp


Index: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -24051,6 +24051,13 @@
                "    return number_zero_v<T>;\n"
                "  }\n"
                "};");
+
+  // Not a clause, but we once hit an assert.
+  verifyFormat("#if 0\n"
+               "#else\n"
+               "foo();\n"
+               "#endif\n"
+               "bar(requires);");
 }
 
 TEST_F(FormatTest, StatementAttributeLikeMacros) {
Index: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
@@ -2994,7 +2994,6 @@
 void UnwrappedLineParser::parseRequiresClause(FormatToken *RequiresToken) {
   assert(FormatTok->getPreviousNonComment() == RequiresToken);
   assert(RequiresToken->is(tok::kw_requires) && "'requires' expected");
-  assert(RequiresToken->getType() == TT_Unknown);
 
   // If there is no previous token, we are within a requires expression,
   // otherwise we will always have the template or function declaration in 
front
@@ -3023,7 +3022,6 @@
 void UnwrappedLineParser::parseRequiresExpression(FormatToken *RequiresToken) {
   assert(FormatTok->getPreviousNonComment() == RequiresToken);
   assert(RequiresToken->is(tok::kw_requires) && "'requires' expected");
-  assert(RequiresToken->getType() == TT_Unknown);
 
   RequiresToken->setFinalizedType(TT_RequiresExpression);
 



Index: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -24051,6 +24051,13 @@
                "    return number_zero_v<T>;\n"
                "  }\n"
                "};");
+
+  // Not a clause, but we once hit an assert.
+  verifyFormat("#if 0\n"
+               "#else\n"
+               "foo();\n"
+               "#endif\n"
+               "bar(requires);");
 }
 
 TEST_F(FormatTest, StatementAttributeLikeMacros) {
Index: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
@@ -2994,7 +2994,6 @@
 void UnwrappedLineParser::parseRequiresClause(FormatToken *RequiresToken) {
   assert(FormatTok->getPreviousNonComment() == RequiresToken);
   assert(RequiresToken->is(tok::kw_requires) && "'requires' expected");
-  assert(RequiresToken->getType() == TT_Unknown);
 
   // If there is no previous token, we are within a requires expression,
   // otherwise we will always have the template or function declaration in front
@@ -3023,7 +3022,6 @@
 void UnwrappedLineParser::parseRequiresExpression(FormatToken *RequiresToken) {
   assert(FormatTok->getPreviousNonComment() == RequiresToken);
   assert(RequiresToken->is(tok::kw_requires) && "'requires' expected");
-  assert(RequiresToken->getType() == TT_Unknown);
 
   RequiresToken->setFinalizedType(TT_RequiresExpression);
 

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits