arsenm added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp:9238
+static llvm::Function *getKernelClone(llvm::Function &F) {
+ llvm::Module *M = F.getParent();
----------------
I don't think we can really start with the function IR. The TargetABIInfo could
be different from the kernel and function form (and will due to using
byval/byref etc.)
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp:9240
+ llvm::Module *M = F.getParent();
+ SmallString<128> MangledName("__amdgpu_");
+ MangledName.append(F.getName());
----------------
I don't think adding a prefix and suffix is a good strategy for something which
in principle should be ABI visible. A period + suffix I think would be a better
convention
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp:9478-9479
+
+ CI->setCalledFunction(Clone);
+ CI->setCallingConv(llvm::CallingConv::C);
+ }
----------------
This is basically just moving what the current hack does into clang. Can we
emit calls to the function version up front?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D120566/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D120566
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
