lichray marked 2 inline comments as done. lichray added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:2396 +def ext_decltype_auto_expr : ExtWarn< + "ISO C++23 DIS does not allow functional-style cast to 'decltype(auto)'">, + InGroup<DiagGroup<"decltype-auto-cast">>; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Is there a reason this one should be `ExtWarn` instead of `Extension`? (I > think we typically only issue this kind of diagnostic when `-pedantic` is > specified.) I took a look at other warnings. It seems that Clang believes that a portable program can contain `Extension`s; if `ExtWarn` is issued, the program is not likely to be portable. I asked GCC folks yesterday to see if they want to implement this extension, and they are not interested. So I guess `ExtWarn` is suitable for now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D113393/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D113393 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
