On 13 June 2016 at 09:25, Lei Zhang <zhanglei.ap...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-06-13 21:02 GMT+08:00 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espind...@gmail.com>: >> Should musl really be an environment? What happens when targeting ARM, >> do we get a gnueabi+musl? Is it used as an environment when >> configuring gcc? > > Honestly I couldn't judge if musl *should* be an environment. But it > *is* used as an environment when configuring gcc, and > "x86_64-pc-linux-musl" could be parsed by config.sub as a valid > triplet. > > As for ARM, I guess something like arm-linux-musleabi would do.
OK, it is slightly annoying that we will have a Foo and FooMusl environments, but if that is what is used for configuring gnu tools I think it is the correct thing for us to do. So the patch LGTM. We can extend it to handle other architectures once it is in. Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
