sammccall added a comment. In D119094#3301297 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119094#3301297>, @Quuxplusone wrote:
> Unfortunately some existing tests fail: > https://reviews.llvm.org/harbormaster/unit/view/2282838/ > I haven't yet figured out why consteval functions are considered to have > `FD->isInvalidDecl()`. There's also an Objective-C failure that I assume > indicates sometimes (when this is a //method// not a //function//) we have no > `FD` at all. I'd need to solve both of these problems (the former being the > difficult one) before I can make progress here. The example seems to be invalid even apart from the missing return value. (I assume on purpose). There's a constexpr version and a consteval version of the same function there. It looks like the call to MergeCXXFunctionDecl reports that the merge is invalid, which will result in FD ending up invalid. Note that if you fix those errors (`return {}`) you hit the error `consteval declaration of 'operator+' follows constexpr declaration` (err_constexpr_redecl_mismatch) which comes from MergeCXXFunctionDecl. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119094/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119094 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
