steakhal added a comment.

I strongly belive that this should be an overload to the existing 'matches' 
API. Maybe add a comment that prefer the other overload if can. But having an 
overload for that alread implies this anyway. That being said, digging out a 
callexpr from a CallEvent and calling the callexpr overload seems to be too 
artifical to me to worry about.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D119004/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D119004

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to