segher added a comment.
In D118297#3285571 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D118297#3285571>, @MaskRay wrote:
> The `volatile` qualifier is implied but makes the intention explicit. I agree
> that the user should not be punished (-Wasm-volatile) by writing `asm
> volatile("int3")` instead of `asm("int3")`.
Not punished no. But it is useful education (like all the other "statement
without effect"
etc. warnings).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118297/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118297
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
