MaskRay added a comment. > It is very likely to break downstream code unless they took a lot of care in > avoiding hidden ehader dependencies, something the LLVM codebase doesn't do > that well :-/
release/14.x will branch soon. Will it be useful to deliberately miss the branch point so that downstream code (with some folks testing trunk llvm) has more time to fix or will that cause headache when llvm-project developers back port fixes to release/14.x? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
