ChuanqiXu added a comment.

In D115610#3269265 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115610#3269265>, @urnathan wrote:

> Seems good to me, @iains you've been looking at this?

According to the discussion in 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51682, it looks like Iains plans to 
implement something like P1184R2 (I found that is your paper!) in clang. So I 
added him before.

(Might you make the status as green?)



================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h:2217
+  /// The gloabl module fragment of the current tranlation unit.
+  clang::Module *GlobalModuleFragmentCache = nullptr;
 
----------------
tbaeder wrote:
> Typos in "gloabl" and "tranlation" in the comment. Any reason to call this a 
> "cache"? This was confusing to me at first.
This is consistent with the current style in Sema. You could find many example 
by searching `Cache;` in Sema.h. I think the semantic is "Cache something to 
avoid search/create again".


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D115610/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D115610

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to