eopXD added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp:184 Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_v_min_vlen", Twine(MinVLen)); + Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_v_max_eew", Twine(MaxEew)); + Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_v_max_eew_fp", Twine(MaxEewFp)); ---------------- eopXD wrote: > craig.topper wrote: > > eopXD wrote: > > > craig.topper wrote: > > > > khchen wrote: > > > > > craig.topper wrote: > > > > > > Would't ELEN be the correct term here? Not EEW. > > > > > https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/blob/master/v-spec.adoc#182-zve-vector-extensions-for-embedded-processors > > > > > shows zve* extensions have `Supported EEW`, I guess it's why the > > > > > term is `EEW`. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that because that section talks about them as a set of values rather > > > > than a single maximum? > > > I think Zve is restricting the EEW, not ELEN. > > The spec defines ELEN as "The maximum size in bits of a vector element that > > any operation can produce or consume" That sounds like maximum EEW to me. > > > > This statement appears in section 3.4.2 > > > > "For standard vector extensions with > > ELEN=32, fractional LMULs of 1/2 and 1/4 must be supported. For standard > > vector extensions with ELEN=64, fractional > > LMULs of 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 must be supported." > > > > I take "standard vector extensions with ELEN=32" to mean Zve32x, Zve32f. > > > > And "standard vector extensions with ELEN=64" to mean Zve64x, Zve64f, > > Zve64d, and V. > > > > Am I interpreting that incorrectly? > Yes I think you are correct. Maximum EEW is an alias of ELEN. > > I see that the discussion in > https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/21 hasn't conclude on > whether changing the name into `elen` and `elen_fp`. > > Should this patch pend until conclusions are drawn? I see that the discussion has now concluded. Thank you @craig.topper for pinging at the c-api PR. Changing macro to `__riscv_v_elen` and `__riscv_v_elen_fp` ================ Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Support/RISCVISAInfo.h:65 + unsigned getMinVLen() const { return MinVLen; } + unsigned getMaxEew() const { return MaxEew; } + unsigned getMaxEewFp() const { return MaxEewFp; } ---------------- eopXD wrote: > frasercrmck wrote: > > Aside from the discussion about EEW vs. ELEN, something about the > > capitalization irks me. I realise we already have `XLen` but `Eew` looks... > > wrong. If other people disagree then that's fine. > Hi Fraser, > FYI, I think there is a discussion happening > [here](https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/21#issuecomment-952307965). > Since we are changing to ELEN now I hope its less disturbing to you and I can resolve this ;) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112408/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112408 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits