benlangmuir added a comment.

> I don't know, I'm a bit skeptical we want to make it so easy to ignore errors 
> so easily. I'd rather require clients to explicitly ignore the error.

That's my gut feeling too. I suspect a bunch of this code should be explicitly 
ignoring `ENOENT`, but not ignoring e.g. `EACCESS`, `EMFILE `, etc.  It seems 
like a bug that we're ignoring all errors right now.

If we really want to ignore all the iteration errors, we should do that 
consistently in llvm::sys::fs not just the wrapper in the VFS layer.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D116659/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D116659

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D116659: [... Jan Svoboda via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D1166... Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D1166... Ben Langmuir via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D1166... Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to