ymandel added a comment. In D117129#3238441 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117129#3238441>, @LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> Another option would be to migrate this to `ClangTidyCheck` itself > and add a flag/option passed to the ClangTidyCheck c'tor to opt-in > to the feature? Right, I was wondering about this. The feature is pretty core to handling C++ files and widely used, so it may warrant that. But, I don't know who the right reviewers are to ask about making changes to the `ClangTidyCheck` class. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D117129/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D117129 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
