On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Eugene Zelenko via cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: eugenezelenko > Date: Tue Jun 7 13:29:15 2016 > New Revision: 272038 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=272038&view=rev > Log: > [Clang-tidy] Documentation style consistency.
Thank you for fixing those up! ~Aaron > > Modified: > clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst > clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-misplaced-const.rst > > Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst?rev=272038&r1=272037&r2=272038&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (original) > +++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst Tue Jun 7 13:29:15 2016 > @@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ identified. The improvements since the > - New `misc-misplaced-const > > <http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/misc-misplaced-const.html>`_ > check > > - Checks if a const-qualifier is applied to a typedef to pointer type > instead of > - the underlying pointee type. > + Checks if a ``const`` qualifier is applied to a ``typedef`` to pointer type > + instead of the underlying pointee type. > > - New `misc-misplaced-widening-cast > > <http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/misc-misplaced-widening-cast.html>`_ > check > > Modified: > clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-misplaced-const.rst > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-misplaced-const.rst?rev=272038&r1=272037&r2=272038&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-misplaced-const.rst > (original) > +++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-misplaced-const.rst > Tue Jun 7 13:29:15 2016 > @@ -3,19 +3,20 @@ > misc-misplaced-const > ==================== > > -This check diagnoses when a const qualifier is applied to a typedef to a > pointer > -type rather than to the pointee, because such constructs are often > misleading to > -developers because the const applies to the pointer rather than the pointee. > +This check diagnoses when a ``const`` qualifier is applied to a ``typedef`` > to a > +pointer type rather than to the pointee, because such constructs are often > +misleading to developers because the ``const`` applies to the pointer rather > +than the pointee. > > -For instance, in the following code, the resulting type is `int *` const > rather > -than `const int *`: > +For instance, in the following code, the resulting type is ``int *`` > ``const`` > +rather than ``const int *``: > > .. code:: c++ > > typedef int *int_ptr; > void f(const int_ptr ptr); > > -The check does not diagnose when the underlying typedef type is a pointer to > a > -const type or a function pointer type. This is because the const qualifier is > -less likely to be mistaken because it would be redundant (or disallowed) on > the > -underlying pointee type. > +The check does not diagnose when the underlying ``typedef`` type is a > pointer to > +a ``const`` type or a function pointer type. This is because the ``const`` > +qualifier is less likely to be mistaken because it would be redundant (or > +disallowed) on the underlying pointee type. > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits