sammccall added a comment. In D114251#3197713 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251#3197713>, @davrec wrote:
> One other thought: can we add diagnostic notes using this new information, > e.g. This sounds plausible, though I didn't want to extend the scope of this patch further. I'm also not sure how often this will be signal rather than noise - I would expect in a large majority of cases that understanding exactly how the name was brought into scope isn't going to be important to understanding or fixing the error. I may be missing something, but the example seems a bit contrived. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
