tra added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20985#448822, @jlebar wrote:
> How is this different from test/SemaCUDA/launch_bounds.cu:27-28? It does > > const int constint = 512; > __launch_bounds__(constint) void TestConstInt(void); > > > which looks verbatim the same as this testcase. Existing test is a declaration of the function which did not trigger the crash. Second issue is that -verify interferes with reproduction case -- the crash does not happen if any //expect-* are seen before it. Plus, the outcome of the failing test is a crash which would prevent reports of other failures. Separate test file makes the crash isolated and reliably reproducible. http://reviews.llvm.org/D20985 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
