aaron.ballman added reviewers: aaron.ballman, whisperity, alexfh,
malcolm.parsons.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: rnkovacs.
Adding some additional reviewers. At a high level, I think this is a reasonable
direction to go, but I wonder if this should be hidden behind a configuration
option or not (basically, was there a reason we didn't cover that case
originally or was it an oversight/left for future work)?
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/modernize-use-default-member-init.cpp:48-49
+struct PositiveNotDefaultInt {
+ PositiveNotDefaultInt(int) : i(7) {}
+ // CHECK-FIXES: PositiveNotDefaultInt(int) {}
----------------
The "default" here is not about the constructor but about the argument to the
constructor, I believe. So I think this should be renamed to
`PositiveConstantMemInit` or something like that (similar for the names below).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114995/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114995
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
