mstorsjo added a comment. In D114651#3158807 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114651#3158807>, @rnk wrote:
> I will add that multiple users have run into this problem, and I think it > might be more practical to consider unaliasing Wall altogether. Clang doesn't > emit the same set of warnings as MSVC. Anyone seriously using `clang-cl > /Wall` is going to receive a pile of `-WcxxNN-compat` warnings that are > self-contradictory, and they are going to need to curate a set of > clang-specific warning flags anyway. One possible downside with that, is that you'd easily end up making cl-compatible build files that works nicely with clang-cl but spew warnings with cl.exe. (Although maybe cl.exe's -Wall produce a much safer/saner set of warnings?) But I don't feel strongly about it.. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D114651/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D114651 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
