manojgupta added a comment. Yes, the current approach of "-march=<isa>+feature" is terrible and does not work with developers who want flexibility of features. This being pitched as a feature imo is akin to promoting a design bug as a feature. Any additive or subtractive alternative is welcome.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D113779/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D113779 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
