Anastasia added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17438#443422, @pxli168 wrote:
> Yes, I found although the khronos have make a clarify with implicit > declarations but they sames to be useful with some program link. And I found > some test case about link could not pass by this reason. > But how should we handle the new added spec? Could you add the tests that don't pass to the Khronos bug? I will try to discuss it on the next call. Thanks! http://reviews.llvm.org/D17438 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
