steakhal accepted this revision.
steakhal added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

In D106823#3109469 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106823#3109469>, @martong wrote:

>> As of diff 5, line 1767 and all the code in the block at line 2184 are 
>> uncovered by the tests you provided.
>
> Thanks, I've added new tests that cover the re-assume logic (the block of 
> line 2184).
>
> However, I was unable to add a test that covers  the case when the 
> simplification of a trivial symbol in the disequality info results an 
> infeasible state (line 1767). Here is how I tried: I had changed the line to 
> an assertion and then initiated the static analysis of the following 
> opensource projects: 
> memcached,tmux,curl,twin,redis,vim,openssl,sqlite,ffmpeg,postgresql,tinyxml2,libwebm,xerces,bitcoin,protobuf.
>  My idea had been, if the assertion would fired then I would use creduce to 
> the create the test case (btw, this is how I added the other infeasible state 
> test case). However, it did not fired.
>
> IMHO, having a defensive check at L1767 is correct b/c there is a slight 
> chance of reaching an infeasible state there. Although the chance is minimal, 
> I cannot prove that is 0.

It's fine by me. Thanks for the investigation.

In D106823#3111110 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106823#3111110>, @martong wrote:

> There are no runtime or peak memory usage growth with this patch (actually, 
> the runtime decreases with a few %).
> I am attaching the measurements results of the latest Diff.F20089096: 
> stats.html <https://reviews.llvm.org/F20089096>

Great!

The tests refer to `reg_$0` by spelling the id number, which is unfortunate, 
but I suspect these tests will break for the slightest changes in the solver 
anyway so I'm not too bothered with this.

Please wait a week for the rest of the members of the community to have a look 
before committing.
@NoQ @Szelethus @ASDenysPetrov


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D106823/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D106823

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to