NeHuang added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/builtins-ppc-xlcompat-trap-64bit-only.ll:131
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    tdi 3, 3, 32767
+; CHECK-NEXT:    blr
----------------
amyk wrote:
> amyk wrote:
> > nemanjai wrote:
> > > Can we add `-ppc-asm-full-reg-names` to the RUN lines so it is more clear 
> > > which operand is a register and which is an immediate. This works on AIX 
> > > now since https://reviews.llvm.org/D94282 landed.
> > Maybe it would be good to pre-commit the change with 
> > `-ppc-asm-full-reg-names` added to the run lines so then this patch can 
> > only contain the pertinent `td`/`tdi`/`tw`/`twi` changes.
> I meant, maybe it is a better idea to commit the test cases with 
> `-ppc-asm-full-reg-names` first, so then this revision does not contain the 
> additional updates of adding the registers in places that is not affected by 
> your patch. However, perhaps if Nemanja thinks adding the option to this 
> patch is OK, then that's fine with me, too. 
Good catch. Let me rebase this patch with ToT. The NFC patch was committed at 
40cad47fd82ecaf253ba9b11fcd34f67dd557e9d.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D112285/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D112285

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to