rogfer01 marked 3 inline comments as done.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:10527
@@ +10526,3 @@
+ if (RD->hasAttr<PackedAttr>() ||
+ ME->getMemberDecl()->hasAttr<PackedAttr>()) {
+ Diag(OpLoc, diag::warn_taking_address_of_packed_member)
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Ah, I forgot that the attribute also affected the alignment of the struct
> itself. Amending my false-positive idea, the following should be fine,
> shouldn't it?:
> ```
> struct __attribute__((packed)) S {
> char c;
> int i;
> char c2;
> };
>
> void f(S s) {
> char *cp = &s.c;
> char *cp2 = &s.c2;
> }
> ```
> I think perhaps we should not diagnose if the member's type also has a
> one-byte alignment (or, for instance, uses alignas(1) to achieve that). What
> do you think?
Yes. I like the idea since the packed attribute has no effect on already
1-aligned data (like char). But note that C++11 does not allow reducing the
alignment through `alignas`.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20561
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
