frasercrmck added a comment.

It looks as though all checks are checking the same thing? Presumably this is 
expected? I wonder if allowing an extra combined check 
(`--check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-ZFH-ILP32F` or something) would make it more 
obvious when things *are* different between the different configs.

I'm not familiar with how `Float16` is supposed to behave if the target doesn't 
advertise support `zfh`, but I come more from OpenCL where it's either fully 
supported or "storage-only", in which case I wouldn't expect a `fadd` to get 
past the frontend (or maybe it'd enforce promotion to `float`?). This isn't 
necessarily a blocker - I'm just showing the limits of my knowledge in this 
area.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D112398/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D112398

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to