aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14839
if (!IsInstantiation)
PopDeclContext();
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> so the only real change here is that `ExitFunctionBodyRAII` ends here,
> instead of the end of the function?
>
> I guess this SEEMS pretty innocuous, I don't know particularly what
> `PopFunctionScopeInfo` does well enough to know if this is going to cause
> problems, but I DO know at least the 14850+ doesn't need to have the function
> body in scope (and PopDeclContext seems like it doesn't do much?)...
>
> I would think that anything after `PopDeclContext` would have a problem being
> in the function body anyway (that is, being in a 'function body' with a
> mismatched DeclContext seems wrong), so I'm reasonably convinced this is at
> least non-breaking.
>
> so the only real change here is that ExitFunctionBodyRAII ends here, instead
> of the end of the function?
That's correct. I added the opening curly brace before the comments on the
declaration of `ExitRAII`, and the close curly brace is on the line with the
new comments added to it. Git decided this was the best diff it could come up
with for all that re-indentation. :-/
> I would think that anything after PopDeclContext would have a problem being
> in the function body anyway (that is, being in a 'function body' with a
> mismatched DeclContext seems wrong), so I'm reasonably convinced this is at
> least non-breaking.
This matches my thinking -- just before we go to pop the declaration context or
scope, *that* is when the function body has ended.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D111814/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D111814
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
