MaskRay added a subscriber: zatrazz. MaskRay added a comment. This is to make more glibc files compilable with Clang. (@zatrazz)
In D111382#3052514 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D111382#3052514>, @hubert.reinterpretcast wrote: > Are we sure this is wise? We know that any future standard C++ type can't be > the same as `__float128` (without changing the latter) because `__float128` > mangles the same as 128-bit `long double`. So by making `__float128` the same > as `_Float128` in C, we're causing the relationship between `__float128` and > the "corresponding" standard types to differ between C and C++. No, but it's hard to change now. Introducing a GCC incompatible scheme probably does more harm than being compatible with them now... > I know GCC went in the direction that has this complication. Do we know > whether they figured their way out? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D111382/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D111382 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
